Festive closure 

Our office will be closed for the festive period from 25 December 2025 and will reopen on Monday 5 January 2026. 

We will be open on 29, 30 and 31 December between 10am – 12pm and 2pm – 4pm. During these times, we will be focusing on handling reviews of crisis grants received due to the urgency of these applications. If you wish to request a review of a community care grant application you can do so online. Alternatively, you can call us on 5 January 2026 and we can take your application over the phone.

Our normal service resumes on 5 January 2026 at 10am. 

Case study

  • Date:
    July 2022
  • Category:
    Decision making with limited information

Example

C had applied for a community care grant for help with removal costs. C had moved home due to their child being bullied at school and within the community. The council declined the application on the basis that C had already moved into the property by the time they had made their decision and could not make a payment retrospectively. C had applied in advance of the move, but had been unable to provide a copy of their tenancy agreement to the council at the time. C requested a first tier review but the council did not change their decision.

We reviewed the council's case file and spoke with C about their situation. They told us that the move took place as part of a mutual exchange of tenancies and that they did not receive the new tenancy agreement until the day after they had moved. We confirmed this with their housing officer.

We disagreed with the council's approach as C's new tenancy could have been confirmed by contacting the housing department. We were satisfied that C had provided the necessary information and that the invoice had only become a debt as the council had declined the award without a tenancy agreement. As such, we changed the council's decision and instructed them to pay the applicant’s removal costs invoice.  We also provided feedback that the council had failed to make sufficient enquiries and that the lack of tenancy agreement should not have precluded an award in this case.

Updated: October 8, 2025