Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 4pm Thursday 17 April 2025 and will reopen at 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still request a review via our online form but this will not be actioned until we reopen. 

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Case study

  • Date:
    August 2022
  • Category:
    Incorrect reason to decline

Example

C asked for an independent review of the council’s decision. They had applied for a crisis grant as they had struggled to budget their income due to cost of living increases. As a result of this, they did not have sufficient money to cover their family’s essential living costs.

The council declined the application stating the applicant was not eligible for a grant due to their application history as they had received two awards in the past 12 months and referenced section 2.31 and 2.32 of the SWF guidance. C asked for a first tier review but the council did not change their decision.

We reviewed the council’s case file and contacted C for further information about their circumstances. We noted that C had only received two awards from the fund so their application history did not prevent a further award. The council had referenced section 2.31 and 2.32 of the guidance which were not applicable to C as they refer to sanctions to which C was not subject. We assessed that the application met the criteria for an award and upheld C’s review request, instructing the council to make a payment of £400.00. We fed back to the council that they had not followed the decision-making process and that their decision making notes did not contain sufficient information.

Updated: August 24, 2022