Your feedback is important to us!

We are looking to run a short online forum/focus session to gather feedback from our customers.  If you would like to take part, please sign up here: Customer forum sign-up

Case study

  • Date:
    January 2025
  • Category:
    Repairs to private property

Example

C applied for a crisis grant to replace their broken boiler. The applicant is a homeowner and cannot afford a new boiler. 

The council declined the application on the basis that C was applying for an item excluded from the fund under annex A point 21 ‘substantial improvements to a private property’. 

We reviewed the council’s file and spoke with C. We noted that C was facing hardship without heating. However, we assessed that the application was for an excluded item and that a boiler was a substantial improvement. Therefore, we did not change the council’s decision.

Feedback for the council

  • The decision notes were not sufficiently detailed in line with the requirements of the guidance
  • The decision letters did not correctly state which stage of the decision making process the application was declined at and they did not provide a personalised explanation of the decision or detail the assistance applied for, all of which are requirements of the guidance.

Updated: January 21, 2025